The court unanimously upheld a 2019 law that expanded the jurisdiction of US courts to hear the terrorism-related claims.

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan said the majority was "wrong" on matters of text, history and precedent in a dissent.

The 7-to-2 decision stressed that it did not address the merits of the dispute, and concerned only whether the producers had ...

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that a pair of lawsuits by U.S. victims of terrorist attacks in Israel against the ...

The U.S. Supreme Court sided on Friday with fuel producers that had opposed California's standards for vehicle emissions and ...

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request to expedite a challenge to President Donald Trump's tariffs. The ruling from the nation's high court means that the Trump administration now has the ...

Report is The Hill’s midday newsletter. Subscribe here or using the box below: Happy Friday! The summer solstice is tonight! 🍦 Did anyone capture any cool photos or videos of ...

Jackson wrote that the Supreme Court did little other than shoring up "unfortunate" public perceptions that the court will ...

But the justices also have 10 cases to resolve that were argued between December and mid-May. One of the argued cases was an ...

The US Supreme Court cleared the way on Friday for American victims of attacks in Israel and the occupied West Bank to sue ...

President Trump has asked an appeals court to delay arguments scheduled for next week in his appeal of the $83 million ...

The victims had sued under the Anti-Terrorism Act, signed into law in 1992. The law was passed to open U.S. courts to victims of international terrorism, spurred by the killing of American Leon ...